On 11/19/2018 06:30 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:18:39 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FWIW, I've created a new vfio-ccw-staging branch where I plan to
collect patches prior to putting together a pull request. (I assume I'm
still the only vfio-ccw maintainer with a kernel.org account, right?)
So far as I know. I can ask around here and see if that should change.
The idea is that this branch can collect patches that are fine but are
targeted to a later release (fixes would still go via the normal
vfio-ccw branch.) Let me know whether that sounds reasonable.
This sounds fine to me. Thank you!
- Eric
VFIO_CCW_STATE_BOXED and VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY have
identical actions for the same events.
Let's merge both into a single state to simplify the code.
We choose to keep VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 7 +------
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
Thanks, queued to vfio-ccw-staging.
