On 07/08/20 16:13, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:43:53PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > Right, but I fear we won't be able to keep current behavior for wakeups: > > RT with highest prio always gets scheduled right away? > > If you consider RT throttling, that's already not the case. We can > consider this fair server to be just another way to implement that. > > At some point, we'll have have to preempt higher priority tasks, that's > the entire point of the thing after all. > Ah, indeed. But I was thinking we might try to do a little "better" wrt to RT Throttling while we are at it. :-) This proposal has the potential to be more flexible and to kick in only when really needed.
