On 07/08/20 15:28, luca abeni wrote: > Hi Juri, > > On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 11:56:04 +0200 > Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Starting deadline server for lower priority classes right away when > > first task is enqueued might break guarantees > > Which guarantees are you thinking about, here? Response times of fixed > priority tasks? Response time, but also wakeup latency (which, for better or worse, is another important metric). > If fixed priority tasks are also scheduled through deadline servers, > then you can provide response-time guarantees to them even when > lower-priority/non-real-time tasks are scheduled through deadline > servers. Right, but I fear we won't be able to keep current behavior for wakeups: RT with highest prio always gets scheduled right away?
