On 2019-02-22 05:59:00 [-0800], Jason Self wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > If it is in fact stable, why did it receive four new "RT only" > > patches on its last upload? > > It was based on what you had said last month [0] that "given how long > v4.19-RT is out, it should "stable" / it should not have any known bugs > / regressions. If so, I am not aware of it. If there is anything, > please let me know" along with the rest of that email. > > Hence usage of the word "perhaps" in my email. Of course there's no gua > rantee that problems aren't discovered later, which seems to be what > you're referring to, just like "around August I backported a handful > patches for v4.9-RT because futex was broken in some corner cases." Yes. So I didn't add my FPU patches into the v4.19 tree because it is big and it might introduce bugs which might be discovered late. But I need a tree where I add patches/fixes. So I can't hand over the tree before I have another one. > [0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=154878524016446&w=2 Sebastian