Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > If it is in fact stable, why did it receive four new "RT only" > patches on its last upload? It was based on what you had said last month [0] that "given how long v4.19-RT is out, it should "stable" / it should not have any known bugs / regressions. If so, I am not aware of it. If there is anything, please let me know" along with the rest of that email. Hence usage of the word "perhaps" in my email. Of course there's no gua rantee that problems aren't discovered later, which seems to be what you're referring to, just like "around August I backported a handful patches for v4.9-RT because futex was broken in some corner cases." [0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=154878524016446&w=2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
