Re: Linux stable vs RT stable and RT dev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve

On 02/06/2018 10:17 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:47:15 -0600
> Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This is where we can put an automated job in place to merge GKH rc
>> stable into the RT branch and report only upcoming merge conflicts.
>> Then no one actually has to report or ask it would just be assumed?
> 
> I'd be careful about this. There's a few (not many) subtle changes that
> get backported to stable that can break RT. You wont be able to notice
> it with compiling, but it can cause deadlocks in certain scenarios.
> 

We agree merge conflicts are only half the battle.  I guess I was not clear that the auto
merge would not be distributed or even public it would just be informative.

It would just be a test for merge conflicts.  And maybe build errors/warnings if we had a limited set
of defconfig options.

Again the merge would be informative so we would know that the Linux stable will merge cleanly or not.
If there was a conflict then that could trigger the merging of the stable into the RT branch to
help the community consumers of the RT branch.

Dan


> -- Steve
> 


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux