Re: Linux stable vs RT stable and RT dev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-02-05 15:17:56 [-0600], Dan Murphy wrote:
> We are catching warnings and errors with these defconfigs.  I have reported 2 warnings but
> I have not received a response.  I guess I should report these to this list as opposed to the maintainers.

You reported two warnings to my private address while I was traveling.
The usual workflow for reporting is to send this to the mailing list and
Cc the RT maintainer(s) (which would contain the email address I am
using right now).

> We have a "next" process that runs nightly that merges in the stable rc candidate into our branch
> so we can anticipate if the new stable or TI developer branches will cause a merge conflict when merged into our branch sets.
> 
> For instance 4.14.17 stable rc caused a merge conflict in the hrtimer.c file. This became a known issue as soon as the stable rc was
> available.  The RT 4.14 upstream branch is currently on 4.14.15 so now our RT branch is blocked from receiving a new stable until the
> RT upstream branch is updated.

I usually do a new release once I have something in my pipe or if people
ask to update new stable due to $reason.

> Dan

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux