On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > I just tried the same thing on my AM33xx and nothing bad happned here. > One thing still: you might want to use "-n" for nanosleep. > > Could you try [0] to check if you are not using more memory than > available? If the OOM-killer kills the program, then it is okay, if the > data-abort exception comes or the kernel crashes in a strange way then > it is HW. > > The tracer do not use any special interrupts on purpose. > Now that I saw rasperry-pi let me ask this: do you have any > non-mainline patches on-top? And if it is the case, could you try to > get rid of them? It is the linux-3.6.y branch of raspberrypi/linux on github with RT patches added. Nothing else custom. > Also you can try the same test without the RT patches? Okay. Hopefully the flurry of spring weddings will break up enough to give me a chance to try this over the weekend. Tom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
