On 05/23/2013 10:36 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 10:24 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 05/23/2013 08:27 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 08:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>>> We don't even need the jump_label infrastructure -- we have >>>> static_cpu_has*() which actually predates jump_label although it uses >>>> the same underlying ideas. >>> >>> Ah right. I wonder if it would be worth consolidating a lot of these >>> "modifying of code" infrastructures. Which reminds me, I need to update >>> text_poke() to do things similar to what ftrace does, and get rid of the >>> stop machine code. >>> >> >> Well, static_cpu_has*() just uses the alternatives infrastructure. > > And as it's a boot time change only, it's not quite in the category of > jump_labels and function tracing. > Right. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
