On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 08:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > We don't even need the jump_label infrastructure -- we have > static_cpu_has*() which actually predates jump_label although it uses > the same underlying ideas. Ah right. I wonder if it would be worth consolidating a lot of these "modifying of code" infrastructures. Which reminds me, I need to update text_poke() to do things similar to what ftrace does, and get rid of the stop machine code. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
