On 05/23/2013 06:29 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 08:19 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> We can add a bit in the architecture bits that >> we use to check against other CPU and system >> errata, and conditionally flush the whole TLB >> from __native_flush_tlb_single(). > > If we find that some CPUs have issues and others do not, and we can > determine this by checking the CPU type at run time, I would strongly > suggest using the jump_label infrastructure to do the branches. I know > this is early to suggest something like this, but I just wanted to put > it in your head ;-) > We don't even need the jump_label infrastructure -- we have static_cpu_has*() which actually predates jump_label although it uses the same underlying ideas. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
