On 04/04/2013 11:32 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 4 April 2013 20:23, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ... and ARM uses the generic C code. >> >> My comments in BZ#12114 still remain. Why can't we make malloc/free >> use PI locks? We need not convert lll_lock, but just make malloc-machine.h >> use a PI-aware lock? > > The trouble (as always) is to decide on when to use PI-aware locks. > Do we do that by default or do we have (*chuckle*) an environment > variable to override the default locks? Maybe this discussion is more > suitable for libc-alpha though, since we can hopefully get all > maintainers to chime in there. The number of tunables just keeps growing doesn't it? Added this to my list of tunables in the WIP document I'm writing: sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/TuningLibraryRuntimeBehavior Cheers, Carlos. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
