On 04/05/2013 01:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 04/04/2013 08:39 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> On 4 April 2013 20:39, Stanislav Meduna <stano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The first thing e.g. the __pthread_cond_broadcast (and most of the >>> other functions as well) does is to grab lll_lock. Is the following >>> scenario possible? >> >> Yes this is possible. I think there is a bug report that describes >> this. We need to convert the pthread_cond_t internal lock into a PI >> one if the mutex guarding it is PI. It's probably tricky to do >> though; I haven't thought it through. > > I have patches out on the glibc alpha list that do this. It is on my > plate to dust these off, reapply and test them, and try to push them > again, I just haven't been able to get to it. > > Patches and test cases available here: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11588 Darren, Thanks, and I assume you have copyright assignment through Intel which is great. As a community I think we're in a better place to review and accept these kinds of patches. Thanks for sticking around for 3 years to make sure these changes get into glibc :-) Cheers, Carlos. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
