Re: malloc/free and priority inheritance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4 April 2013 20:23, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ... and ARM uses the generic C code.
>
> My comments in BZ#12114 still remain. Why can't we make malloc/free
> use PI locks? We need not convert lll_lock, but just make malloc-machine.h
> use a PI-aware lock?

The trouble (as always) is to decide on when to use PI-aware locks.
Do we do that by default or do we have (*chuckle*) an environment
variable to override the default locks?  Maybe this discussion is more
suitable for libc-alpha though, since we can hopefully get all
maintainers to chime in there.

Siddhesh
--
http://siddhesh.in
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux