Re: Using patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 increases latency and CPU usage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-05-11, Remy Bohmer <linux@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/5/10 Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> If the 20usec requirement is hard, you can also look at using an FIQ.
>>
>> Does the normal AT91 kernel not use FIQs at all? ?If so, I might be
>> able to dedicate the FIQ to this function and have it happen without
>> the Linux kernel knowing about it (or affecting it). ?Any
>> communication between it and a normal user-task would have to be
>> handled carefully...
>
> No, the kernel does not use the FIQ at all. It is free for you to use
> as you want. Communication with the FIQ handler can be done using a
> queue based on atomic instructions.

Thanks!  I was about to start looking into that...

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! I just forgot my whole
                                  at               philosophy of life!!!
                              gmail.com            

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux