Hi, >>> that is what i thought for years ... but according to [1] a page fault >>> in an rt process freezes the entire process with both rt and non-rt >>> threads until the page fault is handled ... >> >> No, we need to get that fixed in the wiki. It may have been the case >> that the entire process was frozen while a fault was being handled, but >> I don't believe that is the case now. If you're in a thread on core0 >> and a sibling thread on core1 faults, you shouldn't be impacted unless >> you're trying to reference the same memory. > > well, then my application seems to be real-time safe ... it would be > nice if the wiki would reflect the current state of the rt-preempt > kernel, though ... Well, I wrote this part of the wiki quite some time ago, and yes it might be outdated on some points. I will look into it, and update it in a couple of days. Kind regards, Remy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
