I think you have a point it certainly needs to be checked whether the RT_PREEMPT patch behaves with an package like Xenomai. My initial reaction is just that in the case of Xenomai, it just applies an Hard Real time constraint on the RT_PREEMPT patch. But it is certainly much better to investigate what happens when we have an Xenomai like RT System behave otherwise. Does it change the RT_PREEMPT patch. On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:11 PM, M. Koehrer <mathias_koehrer@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Sujit, > > thanks for your response. > I am actually interested in the way, the communication with the RT_PREEMPT patch > works to get an understanding what pieces of the overall system can be tuned and > which priorities of threads are relevant and which SMP affinities are relevant. > > As rtnet can only handle UDP it is obvious, that it is performing slightly better, > however a good understanding is important in any case. > >> 1. Is Xenomai is Configured to take care of Multicore Hard real time >> Computation? Since >> you say that the Thread is running in Processor 3. How is Xenomai >> Configured in case >> of the Multicore Solution >> 2. What are these hard real time computations in this particular thread? >> 3. How is Xenomai Taking care of this thread? >> 4. RTNET is running the UDP Part of Thread or Does not fork in Xenomai. >> > > Regards > > Mathias > > -- > Mathias Koehrer > mathias_koehrer@xxxxxxxx > > > Arcor.de Gaming Area - kostenfrei daddeln bis der Arzt kommt! > Jetzt checken und aus über 80 Spielen wählen! > http://www.arcor.de/footer-gaming/ > -- -- Sujit K M -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html