Hello Steven, > Perhaps adding in a new command line interface (We may need to extend the > command line size limit). Where one could do > irq_priority_map=10-51,21-40,... Where the first number is the irq number > followed by the irq priority. We can also do something similar to > softirqs. > > Would something like that satisfy your needs? Yeah, it would at least suit my needs :-) But, the irq-numbers to be defined is hardware specific, and even board specific on X86. Maybe someone wants to give a certain interrupt handler a different priority, but not a certain IRQ-number to keep it possible to use 1 target image usable on multiple boards with 1 single kernel and 1 single config. How to define that on a kernel commandline is still a question to me... > When I get time, I can write up a patch to do something like this. I could write a proposal on a solution for this, and if we all agree for one solution, I could make the patch for this. (Maybe I have more time free than you ;-) ) Remy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
