On 28/05/2024 17:47, Sergey Shtylyov wrote: > On 5/28/24 7:44 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote: > >>> Make use of the busypolling status returned from NAPI complete to decide >> >> My spellchecker/translator trip over "busypolling" -- consider using >> "busy-polling"? >> And did you actually mean napi_complete_done()? > > Ah, napi_complete() also returns a result... maybe this should be reworded > as "NAPI completion"? > >>> if interrupts shall be re-enabled or not. This is useful to reduce the >>> interrupt overhead. >>> >>> While at it switch to using napi_complete_done() as it take into account >> >> Takes. >> >>> the work done when providing the busypolling status. >> >> Again, "busy-polling"? Ack to all of the above. I used the commit message suggested by Niklas here. I'll revise it a little for v5... Thanks, -- Paul Barker
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
