On 5/28/24 7:44 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote: >> Make use of the busypolling status returned from NAPI complete to decide > > My spellchecker/translator trip over "busypolling" -- consider using > "busy-polling"? > And did you actually mean napi_complete_done()? Ah, napi_complete() also returns a result... maybe this should be reworded as "NAPI completion"? >> if interrupts shall be re-enabled or not. This is useful to reduce the >> interrupt overhead. >> >> While at it switch to using napi_complete_done() as it take into account > > Takes. > >> the work done when providing the busypolling status. > > Again, "busy-polling"? > >> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [...] MBR, Sergey
