On 5/28/24 6:03 PM, Paul Barker wrote: > Make use of the busypolling status returned from NAPI complete to decide My spellchecker/translator trip over "busypolling" -- consider using "busy-polling"? And did you actually mean napi_complete_done()? > if interrupts shall be re-enabled or not. This is useful to reduce the > interrupt overhead. > > While at it switch to using napi_complete_done() as it take into account Takes. > the work done when providing the busypolling status. Again, "busy-polling"? > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [...] MBR, Sergey
