Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: I don't want to review Renesas Ethernet Switch driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 01:46:32PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> On 1/5/24 5:42 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >>>> I don't know this hardware, I don't have the manuals for it, so I can't
> >>>> provide a good review.  Let's exclude the Ethernet Switch related files.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Sergey,
> >>
> >>   Hi Simon, long time, no see... :-)
> >>
> >>> I don't know the back story to this, if there is one.
> >>
> >>    Not much of a history: I got a lot of the rswitch patches in my
> >> inbox and I mostly ignored them... but kept deferring this patch due
> >> to a high load with fixing Svace's reports at work...
> >>
> >>> But could I suggest that:
> >>>
> >>> 1. The patch also updates the title MAINTAINERS section to cover the
> >>>    remaining two drivers.
> >>>
> >>>    e.g.: RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS ->
> >>>          RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS
> >>>
> >>>    Or alternatively, create separate sections for each driver.
> >>
> >>    Yeah, this 2nd option seems cleaner. Still not sure about Kconfig/
> >> Makefile though...
> > 
> > How about adding "COMMON PARTS" section?
> > 
> > - RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS : For ravb and sh_eth
> > - RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS (COMMON PARTS) : For Kconfig/Makefile in drivers/net/ethernet/renesas
> > - RENESAS ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER : For rswitch
> 
>    No, this seems too much for these poor little couple files. :-)
> Listing them in each new MAINTAINERS entry should achieve the same goal
> and seems a biut cleaner...
> 
> >>>    n.b.: This may involve moving sections to maintain alphabetical order
> >>>          by section title
> >>>
> >>> 2. Reaching out to Shimoda-san (CCed) or other relevant parties
> >>>    to see if an appropriate maintainer or maintainers for the
> >>>    Renesas Ethernet Switch driver can be found.
> > 
> > I'm happy if I'm a maintainer for Renesas Ethernet Switch driver.
> 
>    Do you want to be a maintainer or just a reviewer (like me)?

FWIIW, either option is fine by me.

> 
> > So, if my idea above is acceptable, perhaps the maintainers can be:
> > 
> > - RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS : Sergey
> 
>    There will be separate entries for those...
> 
> > - RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS (COMMON PARTS) : Sergey and Shimoda
> 
>    I'd like to avoid that... :-)
> 
> > - RENESAS ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER : Shimoda
> 
> >>>    n.b.: It may still be a holiday period in Japan for the rest of the week.
> >>
> >>    It's a holiday period here in Russia as well, till the 8th of Jaunary. :-)
> > 
> > I'm back from today, but next Monday (8th) is a holiday in Japan :)
> 
>    You're back for 1 day? :-)
> 
> > Best regards,
> > Yoshihiro Shimoda
> > 
> >>> 3. Rephrase the subject and patch description as splitting out maintenance of
> >>>    the Renesas Ethernet Switch driver .
> 
>    The question that remains still unaddressed: should I do the MAINTAINERS
> "directory split" with a single patch?

That seems easiest to me.

> 
> [...]
> 
> MBR, Sergey




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux