Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: I don't want to review Renesas Ethernet Switch driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/5/24 5:42 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
[...]

>>>> I don't know this hardware, I don't have the manuals for it, so I can't
>>>> provide a good review.  Let's exclude the Ethernet Switch related files.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>>   Hi Simon, long time, no see... :-)
>>
>>> I don't know the back story to this, if there is one.
>>
>>    Not much of a history: I got a lot of the rswitch patches in my
>> inbox and I mostly ignored them... but kept deferring this patch due
>> to a high load with fixing Svace's reports at work...
>>
>>> But could I suggest that:
>>>
>>> 1. The patch also updates the title MAINTAINERS section to cover the
>>>    remaining two drivers.
>>>
>>>    e.g.: RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS ->
>>>          RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS
>>>
>>>    Or alternatively, create separate sections for each driver.
>>
>>    Yeah, this 2nd option seems cleaner. Still not sure about Kconfig/
>> Makefile though...
> 
> How about adding "COMMON PARTS" section?
> 
> - RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS : For ravb and sh_eth
> - RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS (COMMON PARTS) : For Kconfig/Makefile in drivers/net/ethernet/renesas
> - RENESAS ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER : For rswitch

   No, this seems too much for these poor little couple files. :-)
Listing them in each new MAINTAINERS entry should achieve the same goal
and seems a biut cleaner...

>>>    n.b.: This may involve moving sections to maintain alphabetical order
>>>          by section title
>>>
>>> 2. Reaching out to Shimoda-san (CCed) or other relevant parties
>>>    to see if an appropriate maintainer or maintainers for the
>>>    Renesas Ethernet Switch driver can be found.
> 
> I'm happy if I'm a maintainer for Renesas Ethernet Switch driver.

   Do you want to be a maintainer or just a reviewer (like me)?

> So, if my idea above is acceptable, perhaps the maintainers can be:
> 
> - RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS : Sergey

   There will be separate entries for those...

> - RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS (COMMON PARTS) : Sergey and Shimoda

   I'd like to avoid that... :-)

> - RENESAS ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER : Shimoda

>>>    n.b.: It may still be a holiday period in Japan for the rest of the week.
>>
>>    It's a holiday period here in Russia as well, till the 8th of Jaunary. :-)
> 
> I'm back from today, but next Monday (8th) is a holiday in Japan :)

   You're back for 1 day? :-)

> Best regards,
> Yoshihiro Shimoda
> 
>>> 3. Rephrase the subject and patch description as splitting out maintenance of
>>>    the Renesas Ethernet Switch driver .

   The question that remains still unaddressed: should I do the MAINTAINERS
"directory split" with a single patch?

[...]

MBR, Sergey




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux