Hi Jakub, Geert, On 05 May 2022 07:59 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 2:58 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Wed, 4 May 2022 15:54:45 +0100 Phil Edworthy wrote: > > > The RZ/V2M Ethernet is very similar to R-Car Gen3 Ethernet-AVB, > > > though some small parts are the same as R-Car Gen2. > > > Other differences are: > > > * It has separate data (DI), error (Line 1) and management (Line 2) > irqs > > > rather than one irq for all three. > > > * Instead of using the High-speed peripheral bus clock for gPTP, it > has > > > a separate gPTP reference clock. > > > > > > The dts patches depend on v4 of the following patch set: > > > "Add new Renesas RZ/V2M SoC and Renesas RZ/V2M EVK support" > > > > > > Phil Edworthy (9): > > > clk: renesas: r9a09g011: Add eth clock and reset entries > > > dt-bindings: net: renesas,etheravb: Document RZ/V2M SoC > > > ravb: Separate use of GIC reg for PTME from multi_irqs > > > ravb: Separate handling of irq enable/disable regs into feature > > > ravb: Support separate Line0 (Desc), Line1 (Err) and Line2 (Mgmt) > irqs > > > ravb: Use separate clock for gPTP > > > ravb: Add support for RZ/V2M > > > arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g011: Add ethernet nodes > > > arm64: dts: renesas: rzv2m evk: Enable ethernet > > > > How are you expecting this to be merged? > > > > I think you should drop the first (clk) patch from this series so we > > can apply the series to net-next. And route the clk patch thru Geert's > > tree separately? > > Same for the last two DTS patches, they should go through the renesas- > devel and SoC trees. Sorry, I mistakenly assumed this was all going via Geert's tree, but of course it's not. I'll split the series in two. > > Right now patchwork thinks the series is incomplete because it hasn't > > received patch 1. Thanks Phil
