Hi Jakub,
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 2:58 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2022 15:54:45 +0100 Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > The RZ/V2M Ethernet is very similar to R-Car Gen3 Ethernet-AVB, though
> > some small parts are the same as R-Car Gen2.
> > Other differences are:
> > * It has separate data (DI), error (Line 1) and management (Line 2) irqs
> > rather than one irq for all three.
> > * Instead of using the High-speed peripheral bus clock for gPTP, it has
> > a separate gPTP reference clock.
> >
> > The dts patches depend on v4 of the following patch set:
> > "Add new Renesas RZ/V2M SoC and Renesas RZ/V2M EVK support"
> >
> > Phil Edworthy (9):
> > clk: renesas: r9a09g011: Add eth clock and reset entries
> > dt-bindings: net: renesas,etheravb: Document RZ/V2M SoC
> > ravb: Separate use of GIC reg for PTME from multi_irqs
> > ravb: Separate handling of irq enable/disable regs into feature
> > ravb: Support separate Line0 (Desc), Line1 (Err) and Line2 (Mgmt) irqs
> > ravb: Use separate clock for gPTP
> > ravb: Add support for RZ/V2M
> > arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g011: Add ethernet nodes
> > arm64: dts: renesas: rzv2m evk: Enable ethernet
>
> How are you expecting this to be merged?
>
> I think you should drop the first (clk) patch from this series
> so we can apply the series to net-next. And route the clk patch
> thru Geert's tree separately?
Same for the last two DTS patches, they should go through the
renesas-devel and SoC trees.
> Right now patchwork thinks the series is incomplete because it
> hasn't received patch 1.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
