Hi Sergei, > Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/18] ravb: Rename the variables > "no_ptp_cfg_active" and "ptp_cfg_active" > > On 9/23/21 7:35 PM, Biju Das wrote: > > [...] > >>> Rename the variable "no_ptp_cfg_active" with "no_gptp" with inverted > >>> checks and "ptp_cfg_active" with "ccc_gac". > >> > >> That's not exactly rename, no? At least for the 1st case... > > > > This is what we agreed as per last discussion[1]. > > > > https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc > > hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-renesas-soc%2Fpatch%2F2021082507015 > > 4.14336-5-biju.das.jz%40bp.renesas.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cbiju.das. > > jz%40bp.renesas.com%7Cec41661b87e14f9e810808d97ebbae07%7C53d82571da194 > > 7e49cb4625a166a4a2a%7C0%7C0%7C637680166814248680%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb > > 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D% > > 7C1000&sdata=ze0ica0K57exFOSQ9LyMuQ%2FFimvOW4PtH8ETxYJ8o6Y%3D& > > reserved=0 > > Sorry, I've changed my mind about 'no_gpgp' after seeing all the > checks. I'd like to avoiud the double negations in those checks -- this > should make the code more clear. My 1st idea (just 'gp[tp') turned out to > be more practical, sorry about this going back-and-forth. :-< So Just to confirm the name to be used are "ccc_gac" and "gptp". Case 1) On R-Car Gen3, gPTP support is active in config mode. (replace "ptp_cfg_active" with "ccc_gac") Case 2) On R-Car Gen2, gPTP support is not active in config mode ( replace "no_ptp_cfg_active" with "gptp") Case 3) RZ/G2L does not support the gPTP feature(if "no_gac" or "gptp" then it falls to case 3). Regards, Biju
