Hi Geert, Thanks for the feedback. > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers: clk: renesas: r9a07g044-cpg: Add USB > clocks > > Hi Biju, > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 2:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:46 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Add clock entries for USB{0,1}. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/r9a07g044-cpg.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/r9a07g044-cpg.c > > > @@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ static struct rzg2l_mod_clk r9a07g044_mod_clks[] = > { > > > DEF_MOD("dmac", R9A07G044_CLK_DMAC, > > > R9A07G044_CLK_P1, > > > 0x52c, (BIT(0) | BIT(1)), (BIT(0) | > > > BIT(1))), > > > + DEF_MOD("usb0", R9A07G044_CLK_USB0, > > > + R9A07G044_CLK_P1, > > > + 0x578, (BIT(0) | BIT(2) | BIT(3)), > (BIT(0) | BIT(2) | BIT(3))), > > > + DEF_MOD("usb1", R9A07G044_CLK_USB1, > > > + R9A07G044_CLK_P1, > > > + 0x578, (BIT(1) | BIT(3)), (BIT(1) | > > > + BIT(3))), > > > DEF_MOD("scif0", R9A07G044_CLK_SCIF0, > > > R9A07G044_CLK_P0, > > > 0x584, BIT(0), BIT(0)), > > > > While the above matches the datasheet, I see a problem with the > > implementation. As BIT(3) of the CPG_{CLKON,CLKMON,RST}_USB is shared > > by the two USB2.0 channels, disabling USB_PCLK or asserting > > USB_PRESETN will affect both channels. So it looks like you need > > special handling to make sure that doesn't happen while the other > channel is in use. > > > > Or am I missing something? > > I'm getting the impression we do have to model the individual bits as > separate clocks (and resets). That would solve the problem with the > shared USB_PCLK, as the clock framework will take care of keeping it > enabled when at least one channel is in use. > > Besides USB, SDHI has 4 clock bits, which we definitely don't want to > control together, as the card detect clock must not be stopped while > suspended. > However, the exception to the rule is Ethernet: each channel has > 2 clocks, but only a single bit to control, so this needs a custom single- > gate-for-dual-clock driver. > > Perhaps merging the clock binding definitions and initial driver for > v5.14 was a bit premature... > Anyway, we'll have 6 rcs after v5.14-rc1 to get it right ;-) > > What do you think? I am ok with this approach for USB, SDHI and Ethernet. Regards, Biju