Hi Geert > > ... > > ipmmu_vi0: iommu@febd0000 > > ipmmu_vp0: iommu@fe990000 > > => avb: ethernet@e6800000 > > => can0: can@e6c30000 > > ---- and ore ---- > > We use numerical sort order, but group similar entries together. > I.e. all iommu nodes are together, and their position is determined by > the unit address of the first iommu node. Ahh, OK, I see. So I guess my posted patch was not good order again ? Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto