Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] i2c: core: refactor scanning for a client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Maybe dev_warn() +  dump_stack()?

That would technically work, yet it feels like a bit like we now
open-code WARN because we shall not use it. I will ask gkh about his
statement...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux