Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] i2c: core: refactor scanning for a client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Quoting GregKH:
> | We really do not want WARN_ON() anywhere, as that causes systems with
> | panic-on-warn to reboot.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191121135743.GA552517@xxxxxxxxx/

Huh? This renders WARN completely useless, or? If somebody wants panic
on warn, this person should get it?

If we don't add a stack trace, we only know that *someone* registered an
invalid address. Finding out who can be annoying. Kieran spotted this
correctly.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux