On 06/04/2018 02:26 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> The PMIC_DA9063 is a complete misnomer, it denotes the value of the >> DA9063 chip ID register, so rename it as such. It is also the value >> of chip ID register of DA9063L though, so drop the enum as all the >> DA9063 "models" share the same chip ID and thus the distinction will >> have to be made using DT or otherwise. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> V2: No change >> V3: No change >> --- >> drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c | 2 +- >> drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c | 2 +- >> drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c | 2 +- >> include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h | 4 +--- >> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > For my own reference: > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. Any other comments before I submit the next round in a few days? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut
