On Sat, 02 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote: > The PMIC_DA9063 is a complete misnomer, it denotes the value of the > DA9063 chip ID register, so rename it as such. It is also the value > of chip ID register of DA9063L though, so drop the enum as all the > DA9063 "models" share the same chip ID and thus the distinction will > have to be made using DT or otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > V2: No change > V3: No change > --- > drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c | 2 +- > drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c | 2 +- > drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c | 2 +- > include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h | 4 +--- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) For my own reference: Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
