Hi Chris,
On 26/01/2017 03:58, Chris Brandt wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
On Wednesday, January 25, 2017, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/rz-pfc/Kconfig | 18 ++
drivers/pinctrl/rz-pfc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/rz-pfc/pinctrl-rz.c | 447
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/pinctrl/rz-pfc/pinctrl-rz.h | 114 +++++++++
6 files changed, 582 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/rz-pfc/Kconfig create mode 100644
drivers/pinctrl/rz-pfc/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/rz-
pfc/pinctrl-rz.c
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/rz-pfc/pinctrl-rz.h
I think we should try to avoid the rz naming as much as possible since
this driver will hopefully be useful for other future Renesas devices if
they move to a similar pin-control type method. Maybe future "R-car" SoCs?
Or, maybe Renesas Marketing decides to come up with a new name for SoCs.
Otherwise, you could end up with a directly like "mach-shmobile" filled
with a bunch of...well...not SH-Mobile parts.
Maybe just
drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-renesas.c
Wouldn't this be confusing, as most of renesas SoC are supported through
drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc instead?
I agree on dropping the rz name, if more SoC will come and join the
pin-based PFC realm...
Thanks
j
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
