Hi Geert,
On Monday 07 Nov 2016 11:57:36 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 Nov 2016 16:34:21 Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> >> There is a bug in the r8a7795 bias code where a WARN() is trigged
> >> anytime a pin from PUEN0/PUD0is accessed.
> >>
> >> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/e6060000.pfc/pinconf-pins
> >>
> >> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2391 at drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7795.c:5364
> >>
> >> r8a7795_pinmux_get_bias+0xbc/0xc8 [..]
> >>
> >> Call trace:
> >> [<ffff0000083c442c>] r8a7795_pinmux_get_bias+0xbc/0xc8
> >> [<ffff0000083c37f4>] sh_pfc_pinconf_get+0x194/0x270
> >> [<ffff0000083b0768>] pin_config_get_for_pin+0x20/0x30
> >> [<ffff0000083b11e8>] pinconf_generic_dump_one+0x168/0x188
> >> [<ffff0000083b144c>] pinconf_generic_dump_pins+0x5c/0x98
> >> [<ffff0000083b0628>] pinconf_pins_show+0xc8/0x128
> >> [<ffff0000081fe3bc>] seq_read+0x16c/0x420
> >> [<ffff00000831a110>] full_proxy_read+0x58/0x88
> >> [<ffff0000081d7ad4>] __vfs_read+0x1c/0xf8
> >> [<ffff0000081d8874>] vfs_read+0x84/0x148
> >> [<ffff0000081d9d64>] SyS_read+0x44/0xa0
> >> [<ffff000008082f4c>] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4
> >>
> >> This is due to the WARN() check if the reg field of the pullups struct
> >> is zero, and this should be 0 for pins controlled by the PUEN0/PUD0
> >> registers. Change the layout of the pullups struct to embed the pin
> >> number inside the struct and loop over it to fetch the correct
> >> information or WARN() if no pin is found.
> >
> > This lowers the memory consumption at the cost of increased CPU usage.
> > Given that the get/set bias functions are not part of a critical path I'm
> > fine with that. We could possibly optimize the implementation by using a
> > dichotomic search, but I don't think that's needed at the moment.
>
> Alternatively, we could steal one bit from the "reg" bitifield to
> add a "present" bit, without increasing the table size:
That's an option too, but given how sparsely populated the table is at the
moment, I'd prefer lowering the memory consumption by moving the pin number in
the table and removing unused entries. The increase in CPU time could be
further limited by using a dichotomic search if needed.
> static const struct {
> u16 present : 1;
> u16 reg : 10;
> u16 bit : 5;
> } pullups[] = {
>
> While 10 bits is not sufficient in general (the PFC register block size
> is 0x50c), it's good enough to address the PUx registers. And if needed,
> we can switch from register byte offsets to register indices, indexing the
> 32-bit register file.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
