Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early

To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:35:44 +0300
Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20160403082513.GA1404@katana>
Organization: Cogent Embedded
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0

On 04/03/2016 11:25 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

    And I still don't feel good about the patch removing the spinlock -- I'm
not sure it's SMP-safe...


In what scenario?


   I've reviewed the patches once again and it looked like they are safe.

MBR, Sergei

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang

References:
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang