Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/01/2016 11:14 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

IIRC my tests showed that if you don't remove
the spinlocks (patch 4), the interrupt latency will already be too high
again.

    Thank you for the valuable info!

Oh, and add patch 6 to it. The context switches are a major problem in
this.

Thanks again! I ended up backporting all the patches up to #9. Not sure it'd be acceptable for the -stable kernels since there's a lot of refactors involved...

MBR, Sergei




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux