Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On 04/01/2016 01:48 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If we don't clear START generation as soon as possible, it may cause
another message to be generated, e.g. when receiving NACK in address
phase. To keep the race window as small as possible, we clear it right
at the beginning of the interrupt. We don't need any checks since we
always want to stop START and STOP generation on the next occasion after
we started it.

This patch improves the situation but sadly does not completely fix it.
It is still to be researched if we can do better given this HW design.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

    Thanks for a great work, Wolfram!
    We need this patch in -stable kernels. The R-Car audio just doesn't work
without it...

Really only this patch?

   Well, my "reverse" bisection pointed at it. :-)

IIRC my tests showed that if you don't remove
the spinlocks (patch 4), the interrupt latency will already be too high
again.

   Thank you for the valuable info!

In any case, you'd need to do some careful backporting to rip
this out of the whole refactoring series.

   Yes, I've already figured that.

But maybe you did that already
and have good experiences?

   Not yet, I will report back after more backporting/testing.

MBR, Sergei




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux