On 5/7/2019 5:08 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:54:56PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
On 5/7/2019 4:42 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:38:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
Israel Rukshin (12):
RDMA/core: Introduce IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY and ib_alloc_mr_integrity
API
IB/iser: Refactor iscsi_iser_check_protection function
IB/iser: Use IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY for PI handover
IB/iser: Unwind WR union at iser_tx_desc
IB/iser: Remove unused sig_attrs argument
IB/isert: Remove unused sig_attrs argument
RDMA/core: Add an integrity MR pool support
RDMA/rw: Fix doc typo
RDMA/rw: Print the correct number of sig MRs
RDMA/rw: Use IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY for PI handover
RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code
RDMA/mlx5: Improve PI handover performance
Max Gurtovoy (13):
RDMA/core: Introduce new header file for signature operations
RDMA/core: Save the MR type in the ib_mr structure
RDMA/core: Introduce ib_map_mr_sg_pi to map data/protection sgl's
RDMA/core: Add signature attrs element for ib_mr structure
RDMA/mlx5: Implement mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg_pi and
mlx5_ib_alloc_mr_integrity
RDMA/mlx5: Add attr for max number page list length for PI operation
RDMA/mlx5: Pass UMR segment flags instead of boolean
RDMA/mlx5: Update set_sig_data_segment attribute for new signature API
RDMA/mlx5: Introduce and implement new IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY work
request
RDMA/mlx5: Move signature_en attribute from mlx5_qp to ib_qp
RDMA/core: Validate signature handover device cap
RDMA/rw: Add info regarding SG count failure
RDMA/mlx5: Use PA mapping for PI handover
Max this is really too many patches now, can you please split this
up.
Can several patches be applied right now as bug fixes like:
RDMA/rw: Fix doc typo
RDMA/rw: Print the correct number of sig MRs
RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code
RDMA/rw: Add info regarding SG count failure
??
Yes we can. Except of "RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code".
Patches that also can be merged now are:
"IB/iser: Remove unused sig_attrs argument"
"IB/isert: Remove unused sig_attrs argument"
what is the merge plan ?
are we going to squeeze this to 5.2 or 5.3 ?
The 5.2 merge window is now open so it will not make 5.2
Can we merge it to your for-5.3 branch after getting green light on this
series ?
which branch should we sent the 5 patches from above ?
It is probably best to repost this thing split up against 5.2-rc1 in
two weeks, I'll drop it off patchworks until then.
Sure, but please approve it to avoid another review cycle.
Jason
