On 5/7/2019 4:42 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:38:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:Israel Rukshin (12): RDMA/core: Introduce IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY and ib_alloc_mr_integrity API IB/iser: Refactor iscsi_iser_check_protection function IB/iser: Use IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY for PI handover IB/iser: Unwind WR union at iser_tx_desc IB/iser: Remove unused sig_attrs argument IB/isert: Remove unused sig_attrs argument RDMA/core: Add an integrity MR pool support RDMA/rw: Fix doc typo RDMA/rw: Print the correct number of sig MRs RDMA/rw: Use IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY for PI handover RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code RDMA/mlx5: Improve PI handover performance Max Gurtovoy (13): RDMA/core: Introduce new header file for signature operations RDMA/core: Save the MR type in the ib_mr structure RDMA/core: Introduce ib_map_mr_sg_pi to map data/protection sgl's RDMA/core: Add signature attrs element for ib_mr structure RDMA/mlx5: Implement mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg_pi and mlx5_ib_alloc_mr_integrity RDMA/mlx5: Add attr for max number page list length for PI operation RDMA/mlx5: Pass UMR segment flags instead of boolean RDMA/mlx5: Update set_sig_data_segment attribute for new signature API RDMA/mlx5: Introduce and implement new IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY work request RDMA/mlx5: Move signature_en attribute from mlx5_qp to ib_qp RDMA/core: Validate signature handover device cap RDMA/rw: Add info regarding SG count failure RDMA/mlx5: Use PA mapping for PI handoverMax this is really too many patches now, can you please split this up. Can several patches be applied right now as bug fixes like: RDMA/rw: Fix doc typo RDMA/rw: Print the correct number of sig MRs RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code RDMA/rw: Add info regarding SG count failure ??
Yes we can. Except of "RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code". Patches that also can be merged now are: "IB/iser: Remove unused sig_attrs argument" "IB/isert: Remove unused sig_attrs argument" what is the merge plan ? are we going to squeeze this to 5.2 or 5.3 ? which branch should we sent the 5 patches from above ?
Thanks, Jason
