On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:54:56PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > On 5/7/2019 4:42 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:38:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > Israel Rukshin (12): > > > RDMA/core: Introduce IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY and ib_alloc_mr_integrity > > > API > > > IB/iser: Refactor iscsi_iser_check_protection function > > > IB/iser: Use IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY for PI handover > > > IB/iser: Unwind WR union at iser_tx_desc > > > IB/iser: Remove unused sig_attrs argument > > > IB/isert: Remove unused sig_attrs argument > > > RDMA/core: Add an integrity MR pool support > > > RDMA/rw: Fix doc typo > > > RDMA/rw: Print the correct number of sig MRs > > > RDMA/rw: Use IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY for PI handover > > > RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code > > > RDMA/mlx5: Improve PI handover performance > > > > > > Max Gurtovoy (13): > > > RDMA/core: Introduce new header file for signature operations > > > RDMA/core: Save the MR type in the ib_mr structure > > > RDMA/core: Introduce ib_map_mr_sg_pi to map data/protection sgl's > > > RDMA/core: Add signature attrs element for ib_mr structure > > > RDMA/mlx5: Implement mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg_pi and > > > mlx5_ib_alloc_mr_integrity > > > RDMA/mlx5: Add attr for max number page list length for PI operation > > > RDMA/mlx5: Pass UMR segment flags instead of boolean > > > RDMA/mlx5: Update set_sig_data_segment attribute for new signature API > > > RDMA/mlx5: Introduce and implement new IB_WR_REG_MR_INTEGRITY work > > > request > > > RDMA/mlx5: Move signature_en attribute from mlx5_qp to ib_qp > > > RDMA/core: Validate signature handover device cap > > > RDMA/rw: Add info regarding SG count failure > > > RDMA/mlx5: Use PA mapping for PI handover > > Max this is really too many patches now, can you please split this > > up. > > > > Can several patches be applied right now as bug fixes like: > > > > RDMA/rw: Fix doc typo > > RDMA/rw: Print the correct number of sig MRs > > RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code > > RDMA/rw: Add info regarding SG count failure > > > > ?? > > Yes we can. Except of "RDMA/core: Remove unused IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR code". > > Patches that also can be merged now are: > > "IB/iser: Remove unused sig_attrs argument" > > "IB/isert: Remove unused sig_attrs argument" > > what is the merge plan ? > > are we going to squeeze this to 5.2 or 5.3 ? The 5.2 merge window is now open so it will not make 5.2 > which branch should we sent the 5 patches from above ? It is probably best to repost this thing split up against 5.2-rc1 in two weeks, I'll drop it off patchworks until then. Jason
