On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 07:34:31AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 1/25/2019 3:30 AM, Lijun Ou wrote:
> > It needs to copy the driver data to the user when creating srq.
> > if copy fail, it need to free the srq resource that have allocated
> > by hns_roce_srq_alloc function.
> >
> > This patch depends on the patch("[PATCH V3 for-next] RDMA/hns: Update the kernel header file of hns")
>
> Should this just be squashed with that fix then? I don't think it was pushed
> to Linus. Or is it set in stone, in which case you should have an actual SHA
> to use here. I guess that's more of a question for Jason really.
There was still time, I squahed it
Jason
