> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:51:42AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > If we did this, and then chelsio does indeed have some cxgb4 patch > > that really needs to be on top of the srq series, do we submit them > > to be merged into linux-rdma with Dave's ACK? Or does Dave pull in > > the prereq srq series? > > Without a k.o account and a PR the patches can only be in one tree at > a time. > > > Or are you saying, if such a patch is inevitable, then the srq > > series needs to be pulled into both Netdev and linux-rdma. > > In this case you'd probably have to wait for the next major kernel > version to send that series to netdev. > That isn't acceptable, I think. Chelsio cxgb4 changes need to flow regularly. > We don't really want to merge netdev only things into rdma exclusively. > > > This is tricky. > > Yes! > Given Chelsio has iscsi, fcoe, TLS/crypto, and iwarp drivers on top of the NIC driver, I think this circumstance will happen more going forward. I'm leaning to a PR from a chelsio-maintained k.o repo... ☹ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
