> > > There are a bunch of changes to the ethernet driver here.. > > > > > > If we take this into the rdma tree you are guarenteeing there will be > > > no conflicts with anything going on with the ethernet side this cycle? > > > > > > Would want DaveM's ack on the ethernet part, I think? Why didn't you > > > CC netdev? > > > > > > Jason > > > > Hey Jason, Yes, this series should CC netdev for sure. Previously, we have > > been able to pull these types of series' through either netdev or linux-rdma > > with the ACK from the other maintainer. > > We usually want to see these as pull requests if they really need to > go to both trees.. Which means you need a k.o account, I think. > > uapi changes like this need to be explicitly acked by RDMA though. > > > I'm not sure how we "guarantee there will be no conflicts"? > > Don't send any patches to netdev that would conflict.. So chelsio would get an account on k.o to stage this series. Then ask both Dave and you/doug to pull the series (once reviewed and accepted) from a k.o git tree. And after that, any commits against cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4 submitted by chelsio should be based on top of this series until it merges into linus's tree. Is that correct? Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html