On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 08:22:59PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote: > Just a side comment. > > From the amount of code going into uverbs_std_types.c for this > new feature it seems like this file is going to get very large quickly. > > Would it be reasonable to split new objects (and/or any new > updates for the standard objects) into new files (uverbs_std_types_flows.c or > something similar). If so, this seems like this would be the opportune > feature to start doing this. Agree. In rdma-core I already started things out this way, let us copy that into the kernel.. Basically one .c file per object.. Matan do you agree? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
