RE: [PATCH v2 rdma-next 2/9] RDMA/CM: move rdma_id_private to cma_priv.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > >
> > Oh I think I know what's happening.  I created these patches on a machine
> that is in PST timezone, and the clock on the system might not even be setup
> correctly.   I use git format-patch for that.  I then pull the patches to Texas
> (CST timezone) and submit them to my email server via sendmail.  So the
> "Date: " in the patch is from the PST patch creation time, and the "Received: "
> times logged by ogc are CST.
> >
> > Why is this confusing patchworks though?  If it uses the patch dates only or
> the received dates only, it should be in-order, I think.
> 
> Even that doesn't explain the above.  There are two vastly different
> timestamps on the emails.  Patchworks is evidently using the Date:
> header, and on the two different files coming from the computer in the
> PST timezone, the times are different by 3 hours.
> 


Thanks Doug.  Guys, I'll have this figured out for posting v3.  Sorry for the pain...

Steve.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux