Re: [PATCH rdma/wip/jgg-for-next] RDMA/netlink: Hide unimplemented NLDEV commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:18:14PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:03:37PM CET, jgg@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:57:06PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:07:16PM CET, leon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> >From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> >The nldev was implemented by following devlink implementation,
> >> >including SET/DEL/NEW commands. However these commands were not
> >> >implemented and hence don't need to be exposed.
> >> >
> >> >Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h | 14 ++++++--------
> >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> >diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> >> >index 17e59bec169e..4c77e2a7b07e 100644
> >> >+++ b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> >> >@@ -227,16 +227,14 @@ enum rdma_nldev_command {
> >> > 	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_UNSPEC,
> >> >
> >> > 	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_GET, /* can dump */
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_SET,
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_NEW,
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_DEL,
> >> >
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_GET, /* can dump */
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_SET,
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_NEW,
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_DEL,
> >> >+	/* 2 - 4 are free to use */
> >> >
> >> >-	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_RES_GET, /* can dump */
> >> >+	RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_GET = 5, /* can dump */
> >> >+
> >> >+	/* 6 - 8 are free to use */
> >>
> >> I don't see reason for the wholes.
> >
> >We are stuck with the holes, it is fixed uABI at this point, can't
> >change the constants we actually implemented.
>
> If it is realeased already, we can't remove the defines either.

Why? There is exactly one consumer - rdmatool and it doesn't use removed
constants.

>
>
> >
> >> Also, Don't you use *_NEW for replies to *_GET, as it is common for
> >> Netlink?
> >
> >It appears not..
> >
> >IMHO that convention makes the most sense when there is a GET/NEW pair
> >with the idea the NEW is formed to be echoed back to the kernel -
> >these case are all GET only..
> >
> >Jason
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux