On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:57:06PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:07:16PM CET, leon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >The nldev was implemented by following devlink implementation,
> >including SET/DEL/NEW commands. However these commands were not
> >implemented and hence don't need to be exposed.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h | 14 ++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> >index 17e59bec169e..4c77e2a7b07e 100644
> >+++ b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> >@@ -227,16 +227,14 @@ enum rdma_nldev_command {
> > RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_UNSPEC,
> >
> > RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_GET, /* can dump */
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_SET,
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_NEW,
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_DEL,
> >
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_GET, /* can dump */
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_SET,
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_NEW,
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_DEL,
> >+ /* 2 - 4 are free to use */
> >
> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_RES_GET, /* can dump */
> >+ RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_GET = 5, /* can dump */
> >+
> >+ /* 6 - 8 are free to use */
>
> I don't see reason for the wholes.
We are stuck with the holes, it is fixed uABI at this point, can't
change the constants we actually implemented.
> Also, Don't you use *_NEW for replies to *_GET, as it is common for
> Netlink?
It appears not..
IMHO that convention makes the most sense when there is a GET/NEW pair
with the idea the NEW is formed to be echoed back to the kernel -
these case are all GET only..
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
