Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:03:37PM CET, jgg@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:57:06PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:07:16PM CET, leon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> >The nldev was implemented by following devlink implementation,
>> >including SET/DEL/NEW commands. However these commands were not
>> >implemented and hence don't need to be exposed.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h | 14 ++++++--------
>> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
>> >index 17e59bec169e..4c77e2a7b07e 100644
>> >+++ b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
>> >@@ -227,16 +227,14 @@ enum rdma_nldev_command {
>> > RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_UNSPEC,
>> >
>> > RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_GET, /* can dump */
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_SET,
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_NEW,
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_DEL,
>> >
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_GET, /* can dump */
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_SET,
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_NEW,
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_DEL,
>> >+ /* 2 - 4 are free to use */
>> >
>> >- RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_RES_GET, /* can dump */
>> >+ RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_PORT_GET = 5, /* can dump */
>> >+
>> >+ /* 6 - 8 are free to use */
>>
>> I don't see reason for the wholes.
>
>We are stuck with the holes, it is fixed uABI at this point, can't
>change the constants we actually implemented.
If it is realeased already, we can't remove the defines either.
>
>> Also, Don't you use *_NEW for replies to *_GET, as it is common for
>> Netlink?
>
>It appears not..
>
>IMHO that convention makes the most sense when there is a GET/NEW pair
>with the idea the NEW is formed to be echoed back to the kernel -
>these case are all GET only..
>
>Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
