Re: SQ overflow seen running isert traffic with high block sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Sagi, what are your thoughts wrt changing attr.cap.max_send_wr at runtime
vs. exposing a smaller max_data_sg_nents=32 for ib_devices with limited
attr.cap.max_send_sge..?
For our device defining max_data_sg_nents didn't help on some scenarios,
It seems that Frequency of the issue occurring increases with number of luns we
Try to run over.

Maybe this is related to the queue-full strategy the target core takes
by simply scheduling another attempt unconditionally without any
hard guarantees that the next attempt will succeed?

This flow is per se_device which might be a hint why its happening more
with a larger number of luns? maybe the isert completion handler
context (which is also workqueue) struggles with finding cpu quota?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux