On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:50:04PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:05:37AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > > If anything should be fixed here, it is to move the degradation closer > > > > to the actual copy_to_user. > > > > > > > > Why was it put here anyhow? I don't see a uapi boundary? > > > > Actually, looking again, in the morning, it seems placed OK. This is > > about as close to the copy_to_user as possible in this flow.. > > So, are you going to pick up? I ment the current code is OK as is and the sa_covert_path is as close to the copy_to/from_user as it can be. What is wrong about this patch is moving the uapi translation further from the uapi boundary. So still dropped. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
